The American Feed Industry Association (AFIA) has commented on the pre-publication of four re-proposed rules pertaining to the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), saying that at first glance, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has incorporated many of the changes AFIA recommended in its original comments.
The reissued rules are Produce Safety Regulation, Foreign Supplier Verification Program, Current Good Manufacturing and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food, and Current Good Manufacturing Practices and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Food for Animals. AFIA previously submitted comments on five major sets of FSMA-related proposed rules during the last 10 months.
"The American Feed Industry Association is pleased the Food and Drug Administration has issued a revised proposal for these complex rules," said AFIA President and CEO Joel G. Newman. "This re-proposal will allow stakeholders to review these rules one last time before the final rule is issued."
While AFIA believes it is reasonable for FDA to re-propose these rules based on complexity alone, the association said it is concerned with the re-proposal's financial impact. "The additional cost, with very limited added benefit, continues to be a major concern for AFIA," said Richard Sellers, AFIA senior vice president of legislative and regulatory affairs. "FDA seriously underestimated the cost of the proposed rule and the additions within this re-proposal have the potential to drive that cost up even further. AFIA is committed to advocate for a final rule that is appropriate for the low risk that animal food presents. The cost-benefit ratio is nearly 20-to-1 and federal laws require the costs to reasonably approximate the benefit."
With input from membership, AFIA will review the latest rules, develop comments and submit to FDA. AFIA staff also intends to work alongside its animal food coalition partners in hopes of the development of consistent comments on the FDA proposals as needed. The comment period to review all four rules is 75 days after publication in the Federal Register. AFIA plans to request an extension to the comment period as all the rules were released simultaneously versus in succession.
"The American Feed Industry Association is pleased the Food and Drug Administration has issued a revised proposal for these complex rules," said AFIA President and CEO Joel G. Newman. "This re-proposal will allow stakeholders to review these rules one last time before the final rule is issued."
While AFIA believes it is reasonable for FDA to re-propose these rules based on complexity alone, the association said it is concerned with the re-proposal's financial impact. "The additional cost, with very limited added benefit, continues to be a major concern for AFIA," said Richard Sellers, AFIA senior vice president of legislative and regulatory affairs. "FDA seriously underestimated the cost of the proposed rule and the additions within this re-proposal have the potential to drive that cost up even further. AFIA is committed to advocate for a final rule that is appropriate for the low risk that animal food presents. The cost-benefit ratio is nearly 20-to-1 and federal laws require the costs to reasonably approximate the benefit."
With input from membership, AFIA will review the latest rules, develop comments and submit to FDA. AFIA staff also intends to work alongside its animal food coalition partners in hopes of the development of consistent comments on the FDA proposals as needed. The comment period to review all four rules is 75 days after publication in the Federal Register. AFIA plans to request an extension to the comment period as all the rules were released simultaneously versus in succession.
No comments:
Post a Comment